Fee Estimation Errors in Access Projects
Definition
Proposals for ramps, bathroom mods, and SDA/LHA assessments often misestimate costs due to overlooked standards, leading to unbillable overtime.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 2,000-10,000 per project overrun; 10-20 hours unbillable per proposal
- Frequency: Per client proposal
- Root Cause: Lack of standardized tools for estimating compliance-driven scope in proposals
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Accessible Architecture players in Australia 🇦🇺 lose AUD 2,000-5,000 per proposal on underquoted fees. Automation of compliant fee estimation recovers this leakage.
Affected Stakeholders
Fee Estimators, Architects, Consultants
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
DDA Non-Compliance Penalties
Lost Deals from Inaccurate Proposals
DDA Non-Compliance Fines
Accessibility Audit Costs
Rework from Audit Failures
DDA Non-Compliance Fines and Court Settlements
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence