EOSL Extended Support Costs
Definition
Failing to plan EOL support leads to reliance on costly third-party hardware/software maintenance post-vendor support end.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 5,000-20,000 annually per EOL device for third-party support
- Frequency: Per EOL hardware/software asset
- Root Cause: Lack of systematic EOL obligation tracking causing reactive procurement
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Embedded software providers in Australia spend AUD 5,000-20,000/year per device on unplanned EOSL support. Automated EOL management negotiates better terms and avoids premiums.
Affected Stakeholders
Procurement, Asset Managers, Support Engineers
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
EOL Software Migration Delays
Unbilled Customisation Services
Rework from Poor Customisation Tracking
Legal Disputes from Poorly Managed Systems
Delayed Invoicing from Untracked Design Wins
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence