Zeitverzögerte Provisionsabrechnung – Verzögerter Geldeingang durch manuelle Freigaben
Definition
Executive search engagements often involve high-value fees of 20–30% of senior executive salaries, with individual invoices commonly in the AUD 50,000–150,000 range for C-suite placements in Australia’s larger markets.[2] Many firms only raise the success-fee invoice once internal documentation confirms the placement, remuneration level, and consultant credit split – information also used to compute commissions. When these steps are handled through email chains and spreadsheets, the time from candidate acceptance to invoice issuance can stretch by 7–14 days, especially around month-end. On top of this, standard Australian business payment terms of 30 days, combined with late payment behaviour, already produce SME DSOs of 45–60 days in professional services according to typical industry commentary (logic-based extrapolation). Each extra 10 days of delay on a portfolio of, say, AUD 5 million in annual billings increases average receivables by about AUD 137,000 (5,000,000 × 10/365). At a conservative 7–10% cost of capital (overdraft or investor hurdle), this ties up AUD 10,000–14,000 in annual financing cost. When delays are closer to 20 days and collection risk rises due to older invoices, effective cost and lost flexibility can approach AUD 20,000–50,000 per year for a mid-size executive search boutique. These are logic-based estimates derived from typical fee sizes in executive search and the impact of manual, sequential billing and commission approval steps on DSO.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Quantified: AUD 10,000–50,000 per firm per year in additional financing cost and working capital drag driven by 10–20 extra DSO days on approximately AUD 5 million annual billings.
- Frequency: Ongoing, recurring monthly with each executive placement and invoicing cycle.
- Root Cause: Manual reconciliation of placement details, credit splits and commission approval prior to invoicing; lack of straight-through integration between ATS/CRM, billing and payroll; reliance on end-of-month batch processes.
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Executive Search players in Australia 🇦🇺 lose AUD 10,000–50,000 annually in interest and working capital drag from 10–20 extra days to cash due to slow commission and billing workflows. Automation of placement-to-invoice and commission approval can compress DSO and free cash.
Affected Stakeholders
Managing Partner / CEO, CFO / Finance Manager, Accounts Receivable / Billing Clerks, Executive Search Consultants
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Evidence Sources:
Related Business Risks
Fehlklassifizierung von Provisionen als Festlohn – Lohnsteuer- und Superannulationsrisiko
Falsche Provisionsberechnung – Verlorene Gebühren und Überzahlung von Beratern
Bad Hiring Decisions from Inadequate Checks
Verification Delays Slow Onboarding
Manual Verification Bottlenecks
STP Phase 2 Payroll Reporting Failures
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence