Capacity Loss from Change Delays
Definition
In IT change management, formal Request for Change (RFC) processes require risk assessment, CAB review, and Forward Schedule of Changes (FSC), causing delays in approving and implementing maintenance changes, resulting in lost productive capacity.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: 20-40 hours/month per IT team at AUD 100/hour = AUD 2,000-4,000/month labour waste
- Frequency: Ongoing for every normal/enhancement change request
- Root Cause: Manual multi-step approval workflows without automation for risk assessment and conflict detection
Why This Matters
The Pitch: IT System Operations players in Australia 🇦🇺 waste 20-40 hours/month per team on manual change approvals. Automation of RFC vetting and CAB scheduling eliminates this capacity loss.
Affected Stakeholders
Change Manager, CAB Members, IT Operations Staff, Business System Owners
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Cost Overrun from Failed Changes
Quality Failures from Unauthorised Changes
Patch Management Rework Costs
Overtime Costs for 24/7 Monitoring
Downtime Losses from Poor Monitoring
Capacity Loss from Manual Testing Downtime
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence