Cost of Poor Quality in UAT Coordination
Definition
Manual UAT coordination results in poor defect detection, increasing post-release rework costs in software testing projects.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 50,000 – 200,000 per major project in rework and delayed releases[4][5]
- Frequency: Per software release cycle
- Root Cause: Manual test processes lacking automation, leading to 90%+ defect detection only pre-release but misses in UAT handoffs[4]
Why This Matters
The Pitch: IT System Testing firms in Australia 🇦🇺 waste AUD 50,000+ per project on rework from UAT failures. Automation of test execution eliminates this risk.
Affected Stakeholders
QA Managers, Project Coordinators, Developers
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
UAT Coordination Overtime Waste
UAT Bottleneck Capacity Loss
UAT Delays Causing Client Churn
ISO 27001 Non-Compliance Fines
Compliance Audit Outsourcing Costs
Certification Downtime Bottlenecks
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence