🇦🇺Australia

Überhöhte interne Kosten für manuelle Bearbeitung von Beschwerden und MDR‑Bewertungen

3 verified sources

Definition

ARGMD and TGA’s regulatory framework require sponsors and manufacturers to maintain robust post‑market monitoring, including risk assessment and investigation of medical device adverse event and complaint reports and maintaining technical documentation.[5][4] Typical complaint-handling processes have multiple phases—intake, investigation, and closure—each requiring data capture, assessment of reportability, and potentially preparation of vigilance reports or recall documentation.[2][4] When these steps are executed with manual tools (email, spreadsheets, disconnected databases), RA/QA specialists often spend several hours per complaint on information gathering, classification, and documentation to meet TGA expectations, including traceability to risk management files and CAPA where necessary.[2][5] Assuming a blended RA/QA labour cost of AUD 80–120 per hour in Australia, and 10–15 hours of effort for complex or potentially reportable complaints (intake clarification, investigation coordination, MDR assessment, documentation, and management review), the internal cost per escalated complaint easily reaches AUD 800–1,800. For a mid‑size manufacturer handling 150–300 such complaints annually, this results in AUD 120,000–540,000 in internal overhead, a significant portion of which is avoidable with workflow automation, integrated data capture, and MDR decision support (logic extrapolated from standard labour costing applied to the complaint workflow described in industry guidance).

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Logic-based estimate: AUD 800–1,800 internal labour cost per escalated or potentially reportable complaint; equating to roughly AUD 120,000–540,000 annually for 150–300 such complaints at a mid‑size manufacturer.
  • Frequency: High frequency for all complaints and adverse events; recurring monthly and scaling with installed base size.
  • Root Cause: Manual, non‑integrated complaint intake; lack of structured forms aligned with TGA/ARGMD data requirements; duplication of data entry between CRM, QMS, and vigilance systems; absence of automated MDR decision trees and templates.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Medical device manufacturers in Australia 🇦🇺 routinely spend AUD 1,000–2,000 in internal labour per escalated complaint on manual MDR assessment and documentation. Automating intake, classification, and reporting can cut this by 30–50%, saving tens of thousands annually.

Affected Stakeholders

Quality Assurance Specialist, Regulatory Affairs Specialist, Post‑Market Surveillance Manager, Customer Service/Technical Support, Head of Quality

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence