🇦🇺Australia

Capacity Loss from POE Performance Gaps

3 verified sources

Definition

Without rigorous POE, buildings underperform against design specs, resulting in inefficient space use and elevated running costs that erode asset capacity.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: 10-20% annual capacity value loss per building (e.g., AUD 100,000+ for mid-size project) from performance gaps[1][4][5]
  • Frequency: Detected 6-12 months post-occupancy, persisting without intervention
  • Root Cause: Decline in POE practices since 1990s, missing occupant behavior impacts

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Regenerative Design projects in Australia 🇦🇺 lose 10-20% capacity value annually due to POE shortfalls. Real-time ecosystem tracking prevents queues in underperforming assets.

Affected Stakeholders

Architects, Building owners, Occupants

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence