Capacity Loss from POE Performance Gaps
Definition
Without rigorous POE, buildings underperform against design specs, resulting in inefficient space use and elevated running costs that erode asset capacity.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: 10-20% annual capacity value loss per building (e.g., AUD 100,000+ for mid-size project) from performance gaps[1][4][5]
- Frequency: Detected 6-12 months post-occupancy, persisting without intervention
- Root Cause: Decline in POE practices since 1990s, missing occupant behavior impacts
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Regenerative Design projects in Australia 🇦🇺 lose 10-20% capacity value annually due to POE shortfalls. Real-time ecosystem tracking prevents queues in underperforming assets.
Affected Stakeholders
Architects, Building owners, Occupants
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Evidence Sources:
Related Business Risks
Cost of Poor Quality in POE Non-Compliance
Waste Management Overruns from Inadequate POE
Non-compliance with EPBC Act
Rework from Inaccurate Baseline Mapping
Idle Time During Manual Site Observation
Verification Non-Compliance and Credit Issuance Failure
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence