🇦🇺Australia

Übersehene oder zu niedrig bewertete Nachlassvermögenswerte

3 verified sources

Definition

Queensland guidance notes that failing to obtain reliable figures can short‑change beneficiaries or create over‑payments and expose executors to personal liability for under‑value transfers, and that forgotten assets such as crypto wallets can be completely lost to the estate if not identified.[1] Estate administration platforms emphasise the need to ensure no items were missed and that all assets and liabilities have documentary proof at date of death to avoid gaps in the inventory.[4] In practice, even a single missed bank account, share parcel, or digital wallet with AUD 10,000–30,000 is common in complex estates, and professional valuers and estate lawyers routinely see disputes triggered when one beneficiary later discovers an omitted asset. Given typical Australian deceased estates often include multiple bank accounts, super, shares, property, vehicles and digital assets, conservative logic suggests 2–10% of gross estate value can be at risk of being omitted or undervalued where no systematic inventory and valuation process is used.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Quantified: Typically 2–10% of gross estate value at risk through missed or undervalued assets; for a AUD 500,000–1,000,000 estate this equates to approximately AUD 10,000–100,000 of potential revenue leakage for beneficiaries, and personal liability exposure of similar magnitude for executors.
  • Frequency: Higher incidence in estates with multiple accounts, family trusts/private companies, investment properties, and digital assets; observed in a significant minority of estates handled without specialist guidance.
  • Root Cause: Fragmented records across banks, brokers, super funds, registries and digital platforms; reliance on family memory rather than systematic searches; use of rough estimates instead of written valuations; failure to identify and document crypto and other digital assets; lack of standardised checklists.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Trusts & Estates players in Australia 🇦🇺 waste AUD 5,000–50,000+ per estate in lost or undervalued assets because inventory and valuation are handled manually and without structured discovery. Automation of asset discovery (bank, share registry, property, digital assets) and standardised valuation workflows captures these amounts and eliminates this risk.

Affected Stakeholders

Executor, Administrator, Trustee, Probate solicitor, Estate accountant, Licensed financial adviser

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Falsche Marktwertansätze mit nachteiligen CGT-Folgen

Quantified: Under‑valuations of 5–15% on real property or share portfolios are plausible without professional valuation; for a AUD 800,000–1,200,000 property, a 10% understatement (AUD 80,000–120,000) can increase beneficiaries’ CGT by approximately AUD 26,000–56,000 per sale. Across an estate with multiple assets, additional tax leakages of AUD 20,000–100,000 are realistic.

Überhöhte oder doppelte Bewertungskosten im Nachlassverfahren

Quantified: Typical avoidable overspend of approximately AUD 1,000–3,000 per estate in redundant valuation work (e.g., one extra full property valuation plus repeated jewellery or business valuations); larger or more complex estates may incur AUD 3,000–5,000 of unnecessary fees.

Verzögerte Nachlassauszahlung durch fehlerhafte oder unvollständige Inventare

Quantified: Delays attributable to inventory/valuation defects of 1–3 months are common, implying approximately AUD 1,500–6,000 per estate in combined opportunity cost of funds (0.2–0.4% per month on AUD 500,000–1,000,000) and incremental holding costs on properties; complex or disputed estates may see 6+ month delays with losses exceeding AUD 10,000.

Steuer- und Haftungsrisiken durch fehlerhafte Nachlassbewertungen

Quantified: Typical downside range of AUD 10,000–30,000 per affected estate, comprising tax shortfall penalties and interest of approximately AUD 5,000–15,000 plus legal/advisory costs of AUD 5,000–15,000 in the event of ATO or state revenue review triggered by incorrect valuations.

Trust Accounting Compliance Penalties

AUD 2,330+ fine per late lodgement (unit penalty AUD 2,330 as per Uniform Law); 15+ hours annually for Part B preparation per practice

ATO Trust Tax Return Non-Compliance Fines

AUD 222 base failure-to-lodge penalty per 28 days (up to 5 units); 20-40 hours annually for manual financial statements

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence