STP Phase 2 Non-Compliance in Crew Payroll Reporting
Definition
Crew scheduling errors lead to payroll discrepancies, failing STP Phase 2 mandates and exposing operators to ATO audits and fines.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 330 per STP failure + AUD 5,500 maximum penalty per quarter; typical AUD 10,000-20,000/year for non-compliant SME operators
- Frequency: Quarterly BAS/STP lodgements
- Root Cause: Double-handling of roster data without integration to payroll systems
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Urban transit operators in Australia face AUD 20,000+ fines yearly from STP failures in rostering payroll. Automated scheduling ensures compliant reporting.
Affected Stakeholders
Payroll Officers, Compliance Managers, Crew Supervisors
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Excessive Overtime from Inefficient Rostering
Idle Equipment and Lost Revenue from Suboptimal Routes
Superannuation Guarantee Shortfalls from Rostering Errors
Manual Paratransit Coordination Overtime Costs
Paratransit Scheduling Bottlenecks
Paratransit Service Span Limitations
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence