🇦🇺Australia

Unerfasste und falsch abgerechnete Serviceleistungen in Wartungsverträgen

3 verified sources

Definition

Australian machinery suppliers and service providers typically operate long‑term service or maintenance contracts for equipment fleets (e.g. conveyors, packaging machinery, forklifts). These contracts include scheduled maintenance plus billable corrective work and parts.[2][5][8] When job capture and contract administration are manual, technicians may perform work that is not matched to the correct contract or not invoiced at all, and contract price increases may not be applied at renewal. Industry field‑service benchmarks commonly cite 1.5–5 % of potential service revenue lost through unbilled work orders and mis‑priced renewals in maintenance‑contract businesses; a conservative 2–4 % is realistic for mid‑size wholesale machinery distributors with multiple long‑term contracts. For a $5 m p.a. service portfolio, this equates to AUD 100,000–200,000 in annual revenue leakage.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Quantified (Logic): 2–4 % des Servicevertragsumsatzes nicht fakturiert (z.B. AUD 100.000–200.000 p.a. bei AUD 5 Mio. Serviceumsatz).
  • Frequency: Laufend bei jeder Serviceleistung und jedem Vertragsrenewal; kumuliert sich über das Jahr.
  • Root Cause: Fehlende Integration zwischen Vertragsdatenbank und Einsatzplanung, papierbasierte Serviceberichte, manuelle Preisupdates bei Verlängerung, fehlende systematische Abgleichsprozesse zwischen ausgeführten Leistungen und Vertragsbedingungen.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Wholesale machinery players in Australia 🇦🇺 waste schätzungsweise 2–4 % des Servicevertragsumsatzes jährlich durch nicht erfasste Einsätze und veraltete Vertragspreise. Automation of contract entitlement checks, job capture and renewal repricing eliminates this risk.

Affected Stakeholders

Service Contract Manager, After‑Sales Manager, Field Service Manager, Finance/Accounts Receivable, Sales (Renewals/Account Management)

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Verzögerter Zahlungseingang durch fehlerhafte oder verspätete Servicevertragsabrechnung

Quantified (Logic): Zusätzliche 10–20 DSO‑Tage im Servicebereich; bei AUD 2 Mio. durchschnittlichem Forderungsbestand und 6–8 % Kapitalkosten etwa AUD 33.000–88.000 p.a. an Finanzierungskosten/gebundener Liquidität.

GST Errors on Progress Billings

AUD 5,000+ fine per BAS lodgement failure; 1-2% revenue leakage from unbilled GST

Lost Sales from AR Delays

2-5% annual revenue churn from customer attrition; AUD 10,000+ per lost retailer account

Customer Credit Approval Delays

AUD 50,000+ per lost major deal (e.g., $380k financing case impacted by delays)

Financing Arrangement Cash Flow Drag

20-40 hours/deal at AUD 100/hr labour + 1-2% financing cost on delayed funds (e.g., $5k+ on $380k deal)

Credit Approval Visibility Gaps

2-5% revenue as bad debt (industry standard for poor credit decisions); e.g., AUD 10k+ per defaulted $200k deal

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence