Bürokratische Overhead-Kosten in der Unterauftragnehmer-Abwicklung
Definition
Germany's F126 frigate and other programs rely on dozens of specialized subcontractors (Hensoldt, MTU, Rheinmetall), but manual flow-down of requirements leads to LkSG compliance overhead and financing delays for Tier 2/3[1].
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: €260M+ program scale with 2-5% admin overhead (€5-13M loss); 40+ hours/month per program[1]
- Frequency: Per multi-year program (e.g., F126 expanded 2024)
- Root Cause: Tiered supplier structure with 12,000+ manual interfaces lacking control towers[1][2]
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Defense and Space Manufacturing.
Affected Stakeholders
Procurement Lead, Program Manager, Subcontract Administrator
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Kapazitätsverluste durch Engpässe in Subunternehmer-Anforderungsflow
Kompatibilitätsprüfungen und Genehmigungen
Kosten durch Fälschungsprüfungen und Ausschuss
Überkosten durch Obsoleszenz-Management
Genehmigungsverzögerungen für Kriegswaffen
Betriebsprüfungsvorbereitung und -reaktion
Request Deep Analysis
🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence