🇩🇪Germany

Fehlende Datenschutz-Folgenabschätzung für Kinderdaten und automatisierte Entscheidungen

2 verified sources

Definition

TikTok was fined for inadequate assessment of data sharing practices and algorithmic recommendation risks for children's accounts. Instagram failed to conduct proper DPIAs before enabling features that exposed children's contact details. Both cases show regulators examining whether platforms systematically evaluated risks to minors before deploying personalization or profiling systems. German data protection authorities (DSK resolution, 2025) now explicitly call for prohibitions on children's consent for profiling, advertising, and automated decisions.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Millions in fines (Instagram, TikTok cases not fully disclosed in search results, but comparative GDPR fines: €5–100 million range); estimated €1–10 million per major platform per investigation; legal defense costs: €500,000+
  • Frequency: Annual; intensifying enforcement post-2024; DSK resolution (2025) signals continued focus on child protection
  • Root Cause: Manual or missing DPIA process for algorithmic features targeting minors; inadequate risk assessment of profiling and automated decision-making; lack of pre-deployment compliance gates

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Social Networking Platforms.

Affected Stakeholders

Data Protection Officer (DPO), Product Manager (algorithmic features), Data Science/ML Engineer, Legal/Compliance, Privacy Engineer

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

DSGVO-Bußgelder für unzureichende Datenschutzfolgenabschätzungen

€35.3 million (H&M case); cumulative GDPR fines globally reached €5.88 billion by January 2025; administrative fines up to €50,000 for Sections 30, 43 BDSG violations

Unzureichende Dokumentation und Nachweispflicht gegenüber Behörden

€35.3 million (H&M; due partly to audit discovery and inadequate documentation); Administrative fines up to €50,000 per violation instance (BDSG §§ 30, 43); typical investigation/legal defense costs: €500,000–€2,000,000 per case

DSA Artikel 26 Nicht-Compliance: Fehlende Anzeigenklarheit und Transparenzanforderungen

€40.000.000 oder 7% weltweiter Jahresumsatz pro Verstoß; typischerweise €5.000-50.000 pro fehlerhaft gekennzeichneter Anzeigenkampagne

Pharma-Influencer Liability & Rückerstattungen: Unternehmen als Agenten haftbar

Typischerweise €10.000-100.000 pro fehlerhafter Influencer-Kampagne (Rechtsverfolgungskosten + Rückerstattungen); Reputationsschaden unquantifiziert

Algorithmen-Transparenz Nicht-Compliance: Fehlende Offenlegung von Targeting-Parametern

€5.000-40.000.000 (je nach Schweregrad und Plattformgröße); durchschnittliche Compliance-Audit-Kosten: €50.000-150.000/Jahr für manuelle Überprüfung

NetzDG-Bußgelder und Verwaltungsstrafen

€2,000,000 (proven Facebook case, 2019); €50,000,000 (maximum statutory); estimated €100,000-500,000 annually per platform for legal/compliance overhead

Request Deep Analysis

🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence