🇮🇳India

अंतरिक्ष घटक प्रोक्योरमेंट विलंब और प्रोजेक्ट ओवरराన (Spacecraft Component Procurement Delays & Project Overruns)

1 verified sources

Definition

Critical components (chips, sensors, launch vehicle materials) require 12-16 months procurement time. Manufacturing gestation begins only post-PO, creating serial bottleneck. Delays cascade to satellite/launcher timelines, forcing extended facility costs, team retention, and project slippage penalties with customers.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: ₹20-40 crore per delayed mission (facility costs ₹2-5 crore/month, team retention ₹5-10 crore, customer penalties ₹10-20 crore); typical ISRO mission portfolio loses ₹50-100 crore annually to procurement-induced delays
  • Frequency: Every major ISRO/private space mission; escalates with SSLV ToT and private launch vehicle programs
  • Root Cause: Import dependency (70-80% critical components sourced internationally), lack of vendor pre-qualification, absence of strategic inventory, gestation period tied to PO issuance, no dual-sourcing for critical items

Why This Matters

The Pitch: India's space missions waste ₹20-40 crore per delayed launch (fuel, team retention, facility costs) due to 12-16 month procurement cycles. Vendor pre-qualification and inventory buffering reduce delays by 4-6 months, unlocking ₹100+ crore in mission revenue and reducing cost overruns.

Affected Stakeholders

ISRO Project Managers, Private Launch Providers, Supply Chain Controllers, Customer Relations (Satellite Operators)

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

भारतीय अंतरिक्ष गुणवत्ता मानक अनुपस्थिति (Indian Space Quality Standard Absence)

Estimated ₹50-150 crore annually in rework, scrap, mission delays, and quality assurance redundancy; typical mission loss from single counterfeit component: ₹10-50 crore per satellite/launcher failure

न्यूनतम लागत चयन (LCS) सरकारी खरीद में निर्णय त्रुटि (Least Cost Selection Decision Error in Government Procurement)

₹30-50 crore annually in vendor non-performance penalties, rework, and mission delays under LCS; estimated ₹10-20 crore per satellite/launcher delayed due to unproven vendor selection; QCBS shift would unlock ₹15-30 crore annual efficiency gains

विक्रेता प्रमाणन और परीक्षण सुविधाओं की कमी (Vendor Certification & Testing Facility Gap)

₹2-5 crore per vendor certification delay (18-24 month cycle vs. 6-9 month optimal); ₹15-25 crore annually across private supplier base; estimated ₹50-75 crore in deferred revenue from unqualified vendors

अनुदान निधि उपयोग प्रमाणपत्र (FUC) में विलंब के कारण निधि रिलीज में देरी

₹50,000–₹5,00,000+ per delayed submission cycle (estimated based on average ISRO project grants ranging ₹10–₹50 lakhs; delay penalties typically 2-5% of annual allocation or potential ₹20,000–₹100,000+ in opportunity cost of delayed disbursement).

स्वीकृत परियोजना लागत में ओवरहेड सीमा उल्लंघन से अतिरिक्त संस्थागत लागत

₹50,000–₹2,00,000 per project (typical for projects ₹15–₹50 lakh total cost; institutions absorbing 2-8% additional overhead beyond ISRO's 20% cap).

निषिद्ध उपयोगों के लिए अनुदान विचलन और निधि वापसी जोखिम

₹1,00,000–₹10,00,000+ per violation (full project overhead clawback or 10-50% of disputed expenses; ISRO may suspend future grants).

Request Deep Analysis

🇮🇳 Be first to access this market's intelligence