Bank de-risking and frozen accounts disrupting treasury’s ability to pay and receive
Definition
Crypto and web3-native companies frequently experience bank account denials and arbitrary freezes of funds, making hybrid crypto–fiat operations difficult. This friction prevents timely payment of employees and vendors and hinders customers and partners from interacting smoothly with the project, indirectly contributing to churn and lost business when treasury cannot operate normal payment rails.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Blocked access can trap millions in operational capital per incident; recurring frictions can cost projects 5–15% of potential deal flow and vendor discounts annually.
- Frequency: Weekly/Monthly (recurring compliance reviews and risk sweeps by banks)
- Root Cause: Traditional banks’ conservative risk appetites and limited crypto integrations lead to over‑cautious de‑risking behaviors (service denial, account freezes) whenever transaction patterns or counterparties trigger internal alerts, even when activity is legitimate.
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Blockchain Services.
Affected Stakeholders
Treasury manager, CFO/Head of finance, Banking relationship manager, Accounts payable/receivable staff, Business development and sales teams
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
$1–10M annual impact depending on studio size: 15–25% creator/developer churn, 5–10% feature delay costs, 2–4% yield loss on trapped liquidity • $1–5M annual impact: 8–12% creator churn, 15–25% marketplace volume decline due to payment friction, fraud losses from untracked refunds • $1.2M–$3.5M annually (developer churn 8–12%, delayed product releases, compliance violations, audit delays)
Current Workarounds
Auditor extends payment terms 30–60 days; client pays in stablecoins to auditor's wallet; auditor manually converts to fiat via secondary exchange • DeFi treasury wallets (Gnosis Safe) with manual multisig approval; payment stream contracts (Sablier); in-kind token payments to vendors; delayed payroll runs • Delayed treasury strategy implementation; use of external crypto-friendly custodians (offshore); manual crypto-to-fiat conversion timing; avoiding bank integration; keeping crypto/fiat separate manually
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Systemic theft and loss from compromised treasury wallets and DeFi exploits
Locked and inaccessible treasury funds due to lost or hard-to-access keys
Forced selling at a loss to meet fiat obligations in volatile markets
Regulatory and tax exposure from manual, error-prone reporting of crypto treasury activity
Treasury misallocation due to poor visibility and misjudged counterparty and liquidity risk
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence