Unpaid or Written‑Off Visits from Skipped/Bad Eligibility & Authorization Checks
Definition
Chiropractic practices that skip or mishandle insurance verification and prior authorization routinely deliver care that is later denied and never paid, forcing write‑offs or patient bad debt. Industry RCM vendors report that a large share of denials are tied directly to coverage/eligibility and authorization errors in this front‑end workflow.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: For a 2‑DC clinic seeing 80 insured visits/week at $70 allowed per visit, a conservative 5–10% of claims lost or written off from eligibility/authorization issues equates to ~$1,100–$2,200 per week, or ~$4,800–$9,600 per month.
- Frequency: Daily
- Root Cause: Front‑desk staff provide services before confirming active coverage, visit limits, copays/deductibles, and prior authorization requirements; they fail to check Medicare’s strict chiropractic coverage rules or ignore pre‑auth for codes like 97140, leading to systemic post‑service denials.[1][4] Manual phone‑based workflows and poor documentation make it easy to miss payer‑specific rules and visit caps.[1][4][7]
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Chiropractors.
Affected Stakeholders
Chiropractor/Owner, Billing manager, Front desk/Patient coordinator, Revenue cycle manager
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
$1,000–$2,500 per month in denied or non‑billable rehab therapy units resulting from missing or incorrect verification and authorization for commercial plans. • $1,000–$3,000 per month in write‑downs and compromised collections on PI massage/therapy tied to unclear up‑front agreement and lack of service‑specific authorization. • $1,000–$3,000+ per month in written‑off auto‑related visits from treating beyond PIP limits, missing pre‑auth, or failing to document coverage before a series of high‑frequency visits.
Current Workarounds
Attorney communications via email instead of formal verification • Benefits for massage are loosely inferred from the chiropractor’s coverage verification, with therapists relying on verbal notes, whiteboards in the therapy area, or EHR comments; detailed checks for modality‑specific limits or prior auth are rarely repeated per visit. • Billing specialist manually reviews claims against paper or email verification notes from front office; discovers authorization gaps AFTER claim rejection; initiates rework using phone tag with payers and patients
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Regulatory and Payer Compliance Exposure from Improper Medicare & Pre‑Auth Handling
Excessive Labor Cost from Manual Insurance Verification and Pre‑Auth Chasing
Rework and Resubmissions from Inaccurate or Incomplete Verification Data
Payment Delays from Eligibility- and Authorization‑Related Claim Denials
Lost Provider and Staff Capacity from Phone‑Based Verification Bottlenecks
Risk of Perceived Upcoding or Medically Unnecessary Care When Verification Is Weak
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence