🇺🇸United States

Lost, misrouted, or compromised send‑out specimens leading to redraws and repeat testing

3 verified sources

Definition

When send‑out samples are not traceable at each handoff, they are more likely to be lost, misrouted, or exposed to out‑of‑range temperatures, forcing recollection and repeat testing. Sample tracking solution providers highlight that manual tracking leads to errors and that real‑time specimen tracking cuts down on mistakes, protects sample condition, and reduces rework.[1][4][5][6]

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: $50–$200 per affected case (recollection visit, staff time, shipping and test repeat) and easily $100,000+ per year for large labs given frequent redraws and repeats on send‑outs reported in quality programs
  • Frequency: Daily
  • Root Cause: Lack of barcoded or RFID specimen IDs tied to each movement; missing temperature and time‑in‑transit monitoring; customs or courier interventions where blocks or tubes are removed and not replaced; no integrated audit trail for outsourced tests.[1][2][4][5]

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Medical and Diagnostic Laboratories.

Affected Stakeholders

Quality managers, Laboratory technologists, Phlebotomy supervisors, Reference lab liaisons, Nursing units and outpatient clinic staff

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

$50–$200 per affected biospecimen in redraw, shipping, and repeat testing, with easily $100,000+ per year in large research programs when frequent redraws and protocol deviations trigger extra monitoring visits, sponsor credits, or loss of future study awards. • $50–$200 per affected case in recollection, staff time, shipping, and repeat testing, plus tens of thousands of dollars annually in sales productivity loss and potential lost contracts when large employer accounts lose confidence in turnaround and chain of custody. • $50–$200 per affected specimen in recollection, repeat shipping, and retesting, plus additional costs tied to delayed public health reporting, contract penalties, or loss of preferred status with state or local health departments—often reaching six figures annually in high‑volume or outbreak periods.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Credentialing and account staff manually cross‑check shipment manifests, courier tracking numbers, and reference lab accession reports in spreadsheets and shared email folders whenever public health partners report missing or delayed specimens. • Credentialing and study support staff rely on email chains with sites and labs, shipment manifests in Excel, and scanned or faxed paper logs to reconstruct where a sample went when CROs report missing, late, or compromised specimens. • Manual tracking via phone calls, emails, or spreadsheets

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Lost charge capture for send‑out tests due to poor tracking and order/result mismatches

$50,000–$250,000 per year for a mid‑size health system heavily using send‑outs (extrapolated from studies showing 3–5% of lab tests at risk of underbilling or non‑billing when tracking is manual or fragmented in outreach and reference lab programs)

Excess courier, shipping, and labor costs from inefficient send‑out specimen tracking

$5–$15 per package in avoidable premium shipping and re‑shipment costs; $100,000+ per year in combined excess shipping, courier hours, and staff search time for a reference‑heavy hospital lab (based on vendor ROI cases where automated tracking reduces labor and courier expenses by double‑digit percentages)

Delayed billing and extended AR from slow send‑out status visibility

5–10 days of added days sales outstanding (DSO) for send‑out claims is common in labs without integrated tracking, equating to tens of thousands of dollars in carrying cost for every $1M of annual send‑out revenue

Technologist and coordinator time wasted searching for and reconciling send‑out specimens

0.25–0.5 FTE per shift in many busy labs (tens of thousands of dollars annually) devoted to chasing send‑outs and reconciling logs vs. automated tracking; large reference labs report needing dedicated staff just to trace missing shipments before implementing advanced tracking

Chain-of-custody and traceability deficiencies risking CLIA/ISO nonconformities for send‑outs

$10,000–$50,000+ per major survey finding when considering internal remediation, consultant costs, and potential lost business if accreditation is at risk; repeated deficiencies can also threaten contracts with payers and referring providers.

Opportunity for inappropriate test billing and misuse of send‑out workflows due to weak tracking controls

$10,000–$100,000+ per year in potential over‑testing and non‑covered tests that may later be denied or clawed back, depending on send‑out volume and payer mix

Request Deep Analysis

🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence