🇺🇸United States

Rework and dispute cost from low first‑pass resolution accuracy

5 verified sources

Definition

Low first‑touch or first‑pass resolution in claims causes repeated contacts, rework, adjustments, and dispute handling. Research shows first‑touch resolution around 59% for claims, meaning over 40% require multiple interactions and each extra touchpoint raises processing cost 15–20%.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: $1.5M–$3M per year per 100,000 claims (assuming 40% of claims incur 15–20% extra handling cost)
  • Frequency: Daily
  • Root Cause: Inaccurate or incomplete initial claim setup, manual data entry errors, poor document capture, and inadequate rules engines, leading to denials, corrections, and additional reviews.[2][3][4][5][8]

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Office Administration.

Affected Stakeholders

Claims adjusters and examiners, Customer service/call center agents, Provider relations teams (for health/benefits), Quality assurance and audit staff

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

$1.5M–$3M annually per 100k claims due to rework costs • $1.5M–$3M per 100,000 claims yearly • $1.5M–$3M per year per 100,000 claims from 40% rework at 15–20% extra cost

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Excel spreadsheets shared via email for tracking disputes • Manual claim re-filing via email; spreadsheet tracking of resubmitted claims; WhatsApp communication with internal teams; printed claim forms with handwritten notes • Manual document assembly in shared drives; status updates via Slack; paper-based claim checklists; informal coordination between AP and claims team

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Overpayment and leakage in claims due to manual, error‑prone processing

$5M–$10M per year per $100M of claims paid (5–10% claims leakage, recurring annually)

Excess administrative cost from slow, manual claims handling

$2M–$4M per year per 100,000 claims (30% excess processing cost vs. automated benchmarks)

Fraudulent and abusive claims slipping through weak controls

3–10% of claims costs attributed to undetected fraud and abuse in many lines (i.e., $3M–$10M per $100M of claims paid, annually)

Extended claim cycle times delaying settlements and recoveries

$500k–$1.5M per year per $100M reserves (extra interest/opportunity cost plus higher operating cost from longer open files)

Lost processing capacity from low automation and bottlenecked staff

Equivalent of 20–40 FTEs per 100,000 annual claims (~$1.5M–$3M per year in avoidable labor or missed capacity)

Regulatory exposure and penalties from delayed or inaccurate claims handling

$100k–$5M per enforcement action plus recurring remediation costs and reserve strengthening (varies by regulator and severity)

Request Deep Analysis

🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence