Radio and Television Broadcasting Business Guide
Get Solutions, Not Just Problems
We documented 10 challenges in Radio and Television Broadcasting. Now get the actionable solutions — vendor recommendations, process fixes, and cost-saving strategies that actually work.
Skip the wait — get instant access
- All 10 documented pains
- Business solutions for each pain
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
All 10 Documented Cases
Suboptimal Scheduling Due to Rights Data Gaps
Waste from inefficient programming (e.g., lost ad revenue)Lack of structured rights data forces poor decisions in syndication scheduling, such as airing uncleared content or missing optimal slots. Without visibility into restrictions or royalties costs, budgeting and planning lead to inefficient programming runs. Manual processes hinder data-driven choices on cash vs. barter deals.
Rights Clearance Failures in Syndication Scheduling
Fines and settlements (systemic risk from unvalidated workflows)Scheduling syndicated content without validating rights availability leads to breaches in licensing, copyright, and FCC regulations. Errors in managing performance rights (ASCAP/BMI) or sponsorship identification result in potential fines or legal disputes. Lack of integration causes ongoing non-compliance in broadcast management.
Rising EAS hardware and maintenance costs due to aging encoder/decoder ecosystem
$2,000–$8,000 per station per refresh cycle in hardware, installation, and engineering time; group owners with dozens of stations can see $50,000–$250,000 per upgrade waveBroadcasters face escalating capital and operating costs to stay EAS‑compliant as legacy hardware encoders/decoders reach end‑of‑life and key vendors exit the market. Sage Alerting Systems, serving roughly 90% of U.S. radio stations and many TV/cable operators, has ceased production of its hardware devices, forcing stations into expensive last‑minute replacements, repair work, and contingency purchasing.
Engineering and operations capacity drained by manual EAS testing, configuration, and troubleshooting
$3,000–$10,000 per station per year in engineering labor and overtime for ongoing EAS checks, retests, and on‑site interventions; multi‑station groups can lose $50,000+ in productive engineering capacity annuallyEAS compliance requires continuous equipment monitoring, routine tests, detailed logging, and configuration updates that consume limited engineering and operations bandwidth. FCC reports after nationwide tests have identified improperly configured equipment and shortcomings in state EAS plans, implying repeated test failures, retesting, and field visits that tie up staff and delay other revenue‑generating technical work.