🇺🇸United States

Suboptimal purchasing and settlement strategies due to poor payment data visibility

3 verified sources

Definition

Fragmented systems and manual reconciliation prevent travel arrangers from seeing true all‑in costs (FX, fees, chargebacks, fraud, and labor) by supplier, route, and payment rail. Without this, they cannot accurately evaluate supplier profitability or choose the most efficient settlement methods.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: 66% of travel companies report their profit margins are impacted by outdated or complicated payment and financial operations systems, indicating significant decision‑quality and optimization losses.[1]
  • Frequency: Monthly
  • Root Cause: Siloed acquiring data, bank statements, and supplier ledgers; lack of consolidated analytics; and under‑investment in payment performance reporting for B2B flows, even as firms manage 7–10 different payment methods.[1][3][7]

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Travel Arrangements.

Affected Stakeholders

CFO, Head of Payments, Procurement / Supplier Contracting, Revenue Management, FP&A

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

$1,000-$3,000 annually per supplier in suboptimal terms; SMB lacks negotiation leverage vs larger agencies • $1,500-$3,500 monthly in unrecovered supplier billing errors, duplicate invoice losses, and labor inefficiency; 2-4% of SMB travel expense budget is lost to unresolved discrepancies • $1,500-$4,000 per event cycle in suboptimal supplier terms and reconciliation delays

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Accountant manually reviews GDS reports, bank statements, and supplier invoices; uses basic accounting software that does not integrate payment settlement data; tracks discrepancies in a separate log • After-Hours Emergency Agent manually verifies vendor compliance (GSA status, minority certification, security clearance) through separate email chains and phone calls; reconciles allowable costs against per-diem/policy manually using shared Excel templates; processes payment through multiple government vendor portals individually • Agent manually cross-references supplier emails, phone calls, personal rate sheets in personal phone notes or WhatsApp with vendor contacts to find available capacity and pricing; tracks payments through separate spreadsheets and bank reconciliation

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Margin erosion from FX spreads, bank fees, and high-cost payment rails on supplier remittances

For airlines alone, payment transactions cost $20.3B annually (2.2% of transaction value, ~78% of net profits), implying multi‑billion‑dollar leakage across the wider travel sector from payment costs and fees every year.[4]

Unrecovered costs from late customer payments versus fixed‑date supplier remittances

Average time to receive payment after invoice due date is 40.3 days; almost 40% of travel businesses report most invoice payments arriving outside specified terms, indicating systematic working‑capital leakage at scale.[1]

Labor cost overruns from manual supplier payment processing and reconciliation

60% of large travel firms lose more than 1.5 hours per employee per week to manual payment processing; at scale this translates into significant additional FTE cost that could otherwise be avoided.[3]

Excess processing costs from inefficient, complex payment ecosystems

Airline payment transactions alone cost $20.3B annually (2.2% of transaction value); broader travel merchants report payment system complexity as a major issue impacting profitability.[4]

Payment errors causing supplier disputes, rework, and service disruption

Manual reconciliations and errors for operators running multiple tours each season can “snowball into major delays and lost productivity,” indicating recurring operational and service‑recovery costs, even if not always quantified as direct refunds.[2][3]

Extended days sales outstanding (DSO) due to late payments and slow settlement cycles

Average time to receive payments after invoice due date is 40.3 days, and nearly 40% of travel businesses report most invoices are paid outside specified terms, implying chronic working‑capital drag.[1]

Request Deep Analysis

🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence