DDA Non-Compliance Penalties
Definition
Inadequate assistive technology compatibility testing exposes firms to ACCC enforcement and court-ordered penalties for breaching accessibility laws, resulting in direct financial losses.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 10,000+ per violation (typical court penalties); up to AUD 50,000 for repeat offenses
- Frequency: Per non-compliant digital service launch
- Root Cause: Manual testing misses WCAG errors in assistive tech compatibility
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Digital Accessibility Services players in Australia 🇦🇺 waste AUD 10,000+ per violation on legal penalties. Automation of assistive technology compatibility testing eliminates this risk.
Affected Stakeholders
CTO, Compliance Officer, Product Manager
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Rework from Failed Compatibility Tests
Churn from Accessibility Complaints
Accessibility Audit Costs
High-End Audit Expenses
Non-Compliance Litigation Risk
Rework from Testing Gaps
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence