Hohe Personalkosten durch erfolglose Förderanträge

Definition

The Australian Industry Group notes that grant application processes are often highly competitive and require "significant company resources" with no guarantee of success, meaning staff time and external advisory costs can be sunk with zero return.[4] Commonwealth guidance confirms that grant programs require structured documentation against objectives, outcomes and eligibility, which typically falls to senior staff on higher salaries.[6] For a medium‑sized industry association lodging 5–10 complex grants per year (Commonwealth and state), a reasonable pattern is 80–150 internal hours per application (CEO/policy staff at AUD 80–150/h fully loaded) plus external grant writer or consultant fees of AUD 5,000–15,000 where used. Assuming 6 applications/year, a 50 % success rate and average total cost of AUD 12,000 per application (internal + external), roughly AUD 36,000/year is spent on unsuccessful bids alone. Larger associations applying for programs such as Industry Growth Program or ARC‑linked initiatives with multiple partners can easily double those costs, leading to annual sunk bid costs of AUD 50,000–80,000 with no corresponding revenue.[1][2][4][6][7]

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Industry associations in Australia 🇦🇺 routinely waste AUD 20,000–80,000 pro Jahr an internen und externen Kosten für erfolglose Förderanträge. Automation and templating of eligibility checks, document assembly and budget validation can cut this spend by 30–50 %.

Affected Stakeholders

Chief Executive Officer, Policy Director, Grants/Projects Manager, Finance Manager, External Grant Consultant

Related Business Risks