Leasing Non-residential Real Estate Business Guide
Get Solutions, Not Just Problems
We documented 34 challenges in Leasing Non-residential Real Estate. Now get the actionable solutions — vendor recommendations, process fixes, and cost-saving strategies that actually work.
Skip the wait — get instant access
- All 34 documented pains
- Business solutions for each pain
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
All 34 Documented Cases
Verlust von Bestandsmietern durch versäumte Optionsausübung
Logikbasiert: ca. 50.000–140.000 AUD Mietausfall und Neuvermietungskosten pro verlorenem gewerblichen Mieter (3–6 Monate Leerstand + 10–20 % Jahresmiete Incentives); bei einem Portfolio mit 10 Mio. AUD Jahresmiete entspricht eine Fehlerquote von nur 1 % der Erneuerungen etwa 100.000–300.000 AUD entgangener Nettomiete p.a. (≈1–3 % revenue leakage).Australische Gewerbe- und Retail-Leases enthalten regelmäßig Optionsklauseln, die verlangen, dass der Mieter sein Erneuerungsrecht in einem engen Zeitfenster (typisch 3–9 Monate, teils 6–12 Monate vor Vertragsende) schriftlich und in genau vorgegebener Form ausübt.[2][3][6][10] Gerichte legen diese Fristen streng aus; verspätete oder formfehlerhafte Mitteilungen sind in der Regel unwirksam.[2][3][6] Versäumt der Mieter die rechtzeitige Optionsausübung, ist der Vermieter rechtlich nicht verpflichtet, den Mietvertrag zu verlängern und kann andere Mieter suchen, was bereits zu Räumungen und Rechtsstreitigkeiten geführt hat.[2][5] Für Bestandshalter von Nicht-Wohnimmobilien bedeutet das: Jeder durch Fristversäumnis verlorene Mieter verursacht Leerstand, Vermarktungskosten, Incentives für Neumieter und Mietausfall. Konservativ gerechnet führt der Verlust nur eines Mieters mit 200.000 AUD Jahresmiete und einer Leerstandsphase von 3–6 Monaten zu 50.000–100.000 AUD direktem Mietausfall zzgl. Maklerprovisionen und Fit-out-Incentives von oft weiteren 10–20 % der Jahresmiete (20.000–40.000 AUD). In Portfolios mit vielen Gewerbeflächen kann schon eine Fehlerquote von 1–2 % an Erneuerungen jährlich 1–3 % der Nettomieteinnahmen kosten.
Produktivitätsverlust durch manuelles Fristen- und Vertragsmanagement bei Mietvertragsverlängerungen
Logikbasiert: 80–240 Stunden manuelle Arbeit p.a. pro Portfolio (20–30 Renewals) × 80–100 AUD/Stunde = ca. 6.400–24.000 AUD Personalkosten pro Jahr; bei größeren Portfolios mit 200–300 Leases entsprechend 15.000–50.000 AUD p.a.Australische Leitfäden zu Commercial-Lease-Renewals betonen die Notwendigkeit, Optionstermine zu diarieren und frühzeitig mit der Verlängerungsplanung zu beginnen, weil Optionsfenster oft nur 3–9 Monate vor Laufzeitende offen sind.[2][6][7][10] Property-Manager müssen: - alle Mietverträge durchsuchen, um Optionsklauseln, Fristen und Notice-Anforderungen zu identifizieren,[1][2][6] - Kalender und Reminder manuell pflegen,[2][6] - Mieter rechtzeitig informieren und deren Entscheidungen einholen,[7][10] - mit Juristen neue Leases/Deeds abstimmen und verschicken.[1][6] In vielen Unternehmen laufen diese Aufgaben über Outlook, Excel und Papierakten, was zu wiederkehrendem Such-, Abstimmungs- und Doppelarbeit führt. Konservativ kann man pro Verlängerungszyklus (Lesen des Vertrags, Fristenprüfung, Abstimmung mit Mieter, Anwalt, internen Stakeholdern, Dokumentation) 4–8 Stunden je Mietvertrag ansetzen. Bei einem Portfolio von 100 aktiven Leases und typischen 20–30 Verlängerungen p.a. bindet dies 80–240 Stunden, also 2–6 volle Arbeitswochen eines Property-Managers. Bei Personalkosten von 80–100 AUD pro Stunde ergeben sich 6.400–24.000 AUD p.a. an reinen Opportunitätskosten je FTE.
Verzögerte Kostenerstattung für Mieterausbauten
Quantified (logic-based): 10–20 days of additional time-to-cash on AUD 2–5 million of annual TIAs, costing approximately AUD 10,000–50,000 per year in financing costs at a 5–8% cost of capital, plus 10–20 hours of staff time per project for manual approval and reconciliation.Tenant improvement allowances in non‑residential leases are often reimbursed after the tenant completes fit‑out works and submits evidence (invoices, certificates, completion notices). Landlords frequently front capital or commit to reimburse within set timeframes once conditions are met. Systems like Procore’s Portfolio Financials emphasise tracking TIAs against live budgets, forecasts, and invoiced values to expose overages, which also supports faster approvals by giving stakeholders a single source of truth.[2] Australian property management platforms such as Re-Leased, Managed App, and maintenance-focused solutions promote automated invoice processing, alignment of actual expenses with budgets, and instant owner payments, highlighting the inefficiencies and delays inherent in manual, paper-based approval chains.[3][4][6] When TIA claims are processed via email and spreadsheets, there are recurring delays in gathering invoices, verifying that claimed works are within the approved scope and cap, and routing approvals to asset management and finance. Each delay extends the period during which landlords have either: (a) paid contractors but cannot yet recover from tenants, or (b) owe cash to tenants under incentive agreements, risking strained relationships and potential disputes. With typical commercial fit‑out projects in Australia often in the AUD 200,000–1,000,000 range per tenancy, even 10–20 days of extra delay in reimbursement or recovery translates into material working capital and interest costs. Assuming an annual portfolio flow of AUD 2–5 million of TIAs and a cost of capital of 5–8%, additional 10–20 days of average delay in recovery approximates AUD 10,000–50,000 per year in financing cost, plus internal labour. This is consistent with the value proposition of Australian proptech platforms that highlight time and cost savings and 'no manual transactions or reconciliations' to accelerate owner payments and portfolio cash flow.[3][4][6][7]
Nicht abgerechnete und falsch verrechnete Mieterausbauzuschüsse
Quantified (logic-based): 5–10% of annual tenant improvement allowance value lost through under‑billing/over‑recovery; for a portfolio granting AUD 1–2 million of TIAs per year, this equates to approximately AUD 50,000–200,000 revenue leakage annually.Australian commercial leases for offices, retail and industrial space commonly include tenant incentives such as tenant improvement allowances (TIAs) or fit‑out contributions, often structured per square metre and capped in total value. Specialist systems like Procore’s Portfolio Financials and CoStar explicitly support tracking TIAs separately from budgets, forecasts and invoiced values, indicating that without such tooling, lessors risk not seeing overages or unused balances.[2][10] Revenue leakage arises when: (1) TIAs are approved to tenants but not fully billed back where the lease allows recovery or amortisation through rent; (2) landlords lose visibility of aggregate dollar and per‑sqm caps and therefore overpay allowances; (3) unused allowances are not clawed back by the agreed deadline because expiry triggers are tracked in spreadsheets or email threads; and (4) historic TIA data is not centralised, so benchmark allowances are mis‑priced in renewals and new leases.[2][10] In Australia, property management vendors market automation as a way to avoid 'lost rental $’s' and to automatically align actual expenses with budgeted income, confirming that manual lease/allowance tracking causes missed income and misallocations.[3][5] For a typical mid‑size non‑residential portfolio (e.g. 20–40 leases, average TIA AUD 150–300/m² over 1,000–2,000 m² per lease), even a 5–10% error rate in billed or recovered allowances can translate into AUD 50,000–200,000 of annual leakage when unbilled contributions, misallocated costs and mis‑priced renewals are aggregated across the portfolio. This is consistent with the push by Australian/ANZ proptech providers to replace spreadsheets with integrated lease and incentive tracking to 'ensure no lost rental $'s' and to automatically align expenses with budgeted income.[3][5][7][10] Although not a statutory compliance issue, the financial impact is a direct hit to Net Operating Income (NOI) and valuation multiples for landlords.