Cost of Poor Quality
Definition
Color matching failures cause weighing errors, poor pigment heat resistance, raw material inconsistencies, and incompatibility leading to breakage and reduced melt flow.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 20,000-100,000/year in material waste and rework (2-5% of production costs for mid-sized firm)
- Frequency: Per production batch or monthly
- Root Cause: Manual trial-and-error in spectrophotometric readings, formula generation, and testing
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Plastics manufacturers in Australia 🇦🇺 waste AUD 50,000+ annually on rework and scrap from color mismatches. Automation of color matching eliminates this risk.
Affected Stakeholders
Production Manager, Quality Control, Process Engineer
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Evidence Sources:
Related Business Risks
Waste from Trial-and-Error
Capacity Loss from Rework
PPAP-Bottlenecks und Freigabe-Verzögerungen
Überhöhte PPAP-Bearbeitungskosten und Doppelarbeit
Kundenabwanderung durch nicht bestandene oder verspätete PPAPs
Capacity Loss from Manual Kanban Bottlenecks
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence