Capacity Loss from Manual Kanban Bottlenecks
Definition
Manual Kanban systems in plastics manufacturing lead to visible bottlenecks, idle equipment, and queues, reducing effective capacity utilization. In pull systems without digital support, leveling production and managing customer releases manually amplifies waiting times and overproduction risks.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 20,000-100,000/year in lost capacity (2-5% of production value for mid-size firm, based on industry benchmarks for idle time)
- Frequency: Ongoing in manual systems, peaks during demand variability
- Root Cause: Manual card processing, inaccurate demand signaling, and lack of real-time WIP visibility
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Plastics manufacturers in Australia 🇦🇺 lose AUD 50,000+ annually on idle capacity from manual Kanban. Automation of scheduling and visual management eliminates this risk.
Affected Stakeholders
Production Manager, Scheduler, Logistics Coordinator
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Inventory Carrying Costs from Kanban Overstock
Customer Churn from Scheduling Delays
Cost of Poor Quality
Waste from Trial-and-Error
Capacity Loss from Rework
PPAP-Bottlenecks und Freigabe-Verzögerungen
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence