Inventory Carrying Costs from Kanban Overstock
Definition
Kanban aims to reduce inventory but manual systems in manufacturing often fail during demand variability, leading to overproduction or stockouts. Plastics firms using two-bin systems still incur high holding costs without digital tracking.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 10,000-50,000/year in carrying costs (15-25% of inventory value annually for C-parts in manufacturing)
- Frequency: Monthly, exacerbated by quarterly customer scheduling cycles
- Root Cause: Demand variability straining manual two-bin systems, lack of real-time leveling
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Plastics players in Australia 🇦🇺 waste AUD 30,000+ annually on excess inventory from Kanban mismanagement. Automation of replenishment cuts carrying costs by 20-30%.
Affected Stakeholders
Inventory Manager, Purchasing, Warehouse Staff
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Capacity Loss from Manual Kanban Bottlenecks
Customer Churn from Scheduling Delays
Cost of Poor Quality
Waste from Trial-and-Error
Capacity Loss from Rework
PPAP-Bottlenecks und Freigabe-Verzögerungen
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence