Core Charge Return Warranty Disputes
Definition
Poor tracking of core charges (refundable deposits on parts like batteries, alternators) results in lost deposits, unreturned cores, customer refunds, and compensation under ACL for faulty parts.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 5,000-20,000 per major dispute; 2-5% of parts revenue in refunds/rework
- Frequency: Per return cycle (monthly/quarterly)
- Root Cause: Manual errors in tracking returned cores vs. billed charges
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Wholesale Motor Vehicles and Parts players in Australia 🇦🇺 waste AUD 10,000+ annually on returns processing disputes. Automation of core charge tracking eliminates warranty claim losses.
Affected Stakeholders
Returns Manager, Parts Inventory Clerk, Accounts Receivable
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Manual Core Charge Inventory Write-offs
Core Charge Refund Fraud
Delayed Accounts Receivable Payments
AR Collections Agency Costs
Storage Fees from AR Delivery Delays
Verzögerte Zahlungsflüsse durch manuelle Bonitätsprüfung
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence