🇩🇪Germany

Staatliche Kostenübernahme durch Operatorinsolvenz (HK-Fall: €1 Milliarde Risiko)

1 verified sources

Definition

The HK plant (closed 1989, owned by RWE and municipal utilities) was excluded from the 2017 Operator Agreement framework. By 2024, the operator reported 'acutely at risk' liquidity and intended insolvency filing. NRW estimates dismantling cost at €1 billion and seeks Federal government reimbursement under constitutional law (Bundesverfassungsrecht: when Länder enforce Federal law, costs shift to Federal budget). This represents a de facto government bailout due to operator credit failure, signaling that operator balance sheet strength is not being monitored in real-time. RWE declined to provide remedial capital injection.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: €1 billion (HK bailout, taxpayer risk); estimated €2–5 billion additional operator credit risk across remaining 6–8 operators (implied by HK scale).
  • Frequency: One-time (HK case); structural risk (ongoing monitoring failure).
  • Root Cause: No real-time operator creditworthiness assessment; static 2017 agreement framework; reliance on self-reported operator financials without independent forensic validation.

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Nuclear Electric Power Generation.

Affected Stakeholders

Federal Ministry (Bundesumweltministerium), State Governments (Länder), Budget Planning / Treasury, Risk & Compliance

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Kostenüberschreitungen bei Kernkraftwerk-Rückbau durch Preissteigerungen

€6–14 billion cumulative underprovisioning (inflation variance, 2013–2025); €50,000–200,000 per operator per annum in audit fees for manual cost recalculation (~300–500 audit hours × €150–250/hour).

HGB §249-Prüfungsrisiken: Unzureichende Rückstellungen und Audit-Qualifizierungen

€50,000–500,000 per audit finding (penalty range); 300–500 audit hours × €150–250/hour = €45,000–125,000 per operator per annum; cumulative across 6–8 operators: €300,000–€1,000,000 annually in preventable compliance overhead.

Manuelle Fonds-Verwaltungsaufwand: KENFO-Koordination und jährliche Kostenrechnungen

200–400 hours per operator per annum × €75/hour (blended FTE rate) = €15,000–€30,000 per operator per annum; across 6–8 operators: €100,000–€250,000 annually in preventable manual labor.

Asse II Minenschacht: Kostenverlauf und Überschreitungen (€417.5M über 5 Jahre, dann €114M jährlich)

Asse II: €417.5M + €114.1M/year ongoing = €530M+ over 6 years; implied cost variance from initial estimate: likely €200–300M (30–50% overrun). Extrapolated to full Germany NPP sector (6–8 sites with similar underground/storage components): €1.5–3B additional cost risk over 25-year horizon.

Redispatch-Kosten und Netzengpässe

Exact amount not disclosed in public sources; typical German redispatch costs estimated at €200-500M+ annually across all TSOs (industry standard: 2-4% of transmission revenue)

Netzausbauplanung und Genehmigungsverzögerungen

€200-400M estimated annual cost of delays and planning inefficiency (typical: 1-2 approval cycles delayed per year × €100-200M per cycle in deferred capacity investment + operational congestion costs)

Request Deep Analysis

🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence