🇩🇪Germany

Manuelle Kapazitätsverwaltung und Engpässe durch PRISMA-Verzögerungen

3 verified sources

Definition

PRISMA platform facilitates capacity trading but relies on manual bilateral contracts (shipper-to-shipper). Capacity nomination and allocation are processed asynchronously with 48–72 hour lag. During high-demand periods, shippers experience allocation delays, forced curtailment, and inability to respond to spot demand. No real-time capacity visibility API published by TSOs (TAG, GUD, GASCADE, OGE).

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: €100,000–€500,000 annually per shipper; 5–15% spot margin loss due to allocation delays; 1–3 customers churn quarterly due to service SLA misses
  • Frequency: Ongoing; peak impact during winter demand season (Oct–Mar) and grid stress events
  • Root Cause: PRISMA is a centralized platform (not API-based); manual allocation by TSOs; no real-time capacity visibility; shipper systems cannot automate nomination workflow

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Pipeline Transportation.

Affected Stakeholders

Trading Manager, Capacity Scheduler, Customer Success Manager

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Fehlende Datenvisibilität und unzureichende Kapazitätsplanung

€75,000–€250,000 annually per shipper; 10–20% excess firm capacity booking (unnecessary cost); 5–8% interruptible capacity deals missed due to lack of real-time availability data; 60–120 hours/year manual capacity planning

Rechnungsstellungsfehler und fehlende Zahlungsreferenzen in der Kapazitätsabrechnung

€50,000–€200,000 annually per shipper; 2–5% of total billing volume unreconciled; 30–60 days excess Days Sales Outstanding (DSO)

Fehlende XRechnung/ZUGFeRD Konformität und Betriebsprüfungsrisiken

€10,000–€50,000 per Betriebsprüfung; 40–100 hours/month manual invoice conversion; 2–3% additional compliance overhead

Ungenaue Tarifkalkulation und versteckte Systemnutzungsentgelte

€50,000–€300,000 annually per shipper; 5–10% budget forecast error on transmission costs; 100–200 hours/year manual tariff reconciliation

Produktdiebstahl ohne SCADA-Erkennung

1-2% Volumenverlust; €50.000+ pro Vorfall

Stillstand durch verzögerte Leck- und Bruchdetektion

€100.000+ pro Tag Stillstand; 30s vs. Stunden Detektion

Request Deep Analysis

🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence