Unfair Gaps🇮🇳 India

Artists and Writers Business Guide

9Documented Cases
Evidence-Backed

Get Solutions, Not Just Problems

We documented 9 challenges in Artists and Writers. Now get the actionable solutions — vendor recommendations, process fixes, and cost-saving strategies that actually work.

We'll create a custom report for your industry within 48 hours

All 9 cases with evidence
Actionable solutions
Delivered in 24-48h
Want Solutions NOW?

Skip the wait — get instant access

  • All 9 documented pains
  • Business solutions for each pain
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report— $39

All 9 Documented Cases

12% GST Levy पर Artwork Cost Markup और Buyer Churn

Estimated: 10-25% reduction in annual art sales volume per artist = ₹2,00,000-₹5,00,000 annual revenue loss for mid-tier artists (₹20-₹100 lakh turnover). For emerging artists (<₹20 lakh), informal sales allow tax avoidance but block formalization pathways.

Search results explicitly state: 'GST has increased the cost of artworks, making it harder for Indian artists to attract buyers'[1][4]. The 12% uniform tax rate on paintings, sculptures, and engravings increased artwork retail prices by 12% post-2017[1][3]. For an artist selling paintings at ₹1,00,000, the buyer now pays ₹1,12,000[1]. This pricing shock in India's informal art market (where price transparency is low) reduces direct-to-consumer sales. The impact is heaviest on emerging and rural artists whose small margins (₹5,000-₹20,000 per artwork) cannot absorb the tax; they either raise prices (losing sales) or reduce margins (reducing profit). The search results note: 'This uniform taxation policy- GST has only added up to the agony of the already struggling Indian art industry'[3].

VerifiedDetails

मेटाडेटा विखंडन और विशेषता त्रुटि (Metadata Fragmentation & Attribution Errors)

₹10-30 crore in annual working capital drag due to extended dispute resolution cycles (estimated 3-6 month average) and 5-15% of usage unallocated pending metadata correction.

Performers cannot easily prove they own a recording because: (1) No unified Indian sound recording registry exists (contrast with CISAC/IFPI international standards); (2) Independent artists often lack formal ISRC codes; (3) Metadata in broadcaster systems, collection societies (IPRS, ISAMRA), and platforms (YouTube, streaming services) is siloed; (4) Manual claim filing and verification is required.

VerifiedDetails

कॉपीराइट अनुपालन अंतराल (Copyright Compliance Enforcement Gaps)

Estimated ₹15-75 crore annually in underreported/unpaid royalties across broadcast, digital, and public performance channels due to weak enforcement and absence of real-time usage reporting mandates.

Evidence: (1) ISAMRA only began formal musician representation in 2024, indicating pre-2024 systemic exclusion; (2) 'Black box royalties' persist due to unaudited usage claims; (3) Copyright Act permits royalty assignments (pre-2012) without performer benefit—2012 amendments attempted to fix this, but enforcement gaps remain.

VerifiedDetails

काली पेटी रॉयल्टी (Black Box Royalties)

Conservative estimate: 5-15% of annual royalty collections remain unattributed. At ₹1.64 billion (2022 PPL India collections alone), this represents ₹82-246 crore annually in trapped/delayed revenue.

Substantial unattributed royalties exist in the Indian music system because: (1) Manual attribution of performances to rightful artists is error-prone; (2) Before 2024, musicians had NO formal collection mechanism (only singers); (3) Metadata standards across platforms and broadcasters are inconsistent; (4) Artist registry gaps prevent proper matching.

VerifiedDetails