व्यय प्रतिपूर्ति में धोखाधड़ी
Definition
Excessive or undocumented reimbursements to board members trigger loss of 12A/12AB tax exemption, converting surplus expenses into taxable income.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: ₹10-50 lakhs tax liability per violation + 85% income spend mandate breach
- Frequency: Per financial year audit failure
- Root Cause: Manual approval lacks reasonableness benchmarking
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Non-profit organizations in India risk ₹10-50 lakhs in tax liability annually on improper expense reimbursements. Automation of approval verifies reasonableness and prevents exemption revocation.
Affected Stakeholders
Trustees, Board Members, Finance Approvers
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Evidence Sources:
Related Business Risks
85% आय व्यय अनुपालन विफलता
प्रशासनिक व्यय सीमा उल्लंघन
प्रतिपूर्ति TDS गैर-अनुपालन
FCRA गैर-अनुपालन जुर्माना
80G/12A प्रमाणपत्र अनुपालन विफलता
ऑडिट दस्तावेज़ीकरण मैनुअल कार्यभार
Request Deep Analysis
🇮🇳 Be first to access this market's intelligence