🇮🇳India

समय-अधिग्रहण सिंड्रोम (Samay-Adhigrahan Syndrome)

2 verified sources

Definition

Inadequate scheduling and critical path management force Indian shipyards into significantly longer construction cycles (2-3 years) compared to global competitors (1 year). This extends delivery timelines, reduces capacity utilization, deters domestic orders, and erodes competitiveness.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: ~200% time overrun = 50% capacity loss; estimated annual revenue loss: ₹3,000-5,000 crore across Indian shipbuilding sector
  • Frequency: Continuous across all shipyard projects
  • Root Cause: Poor critical path management, lack of modern scheduling tools, infrastructure bottlenecks, manual project coordination

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Indian shipyards lose ₹3,000-5,000 crore in potential revenue annually due to 2-3 year construction timelines versus 1-year global benchmarks. Critical path optimization and digital scheduling recovery could unlock 50%+ throughput capacity.

Affected Stakeholders

Project Schedulers, Operations Directors, Sales/Business Development, Capacity Planners

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

निर्माण लागत अधिक्य (Nirman Lagat Adhikshy)

25-30% cost premium on vessel construction; typical impact: ₹5-15 crore per large vessel project

पूर्व वित्तीय सहायता योजना विफलता (Purv Viprav Sahayata Yojana Viphlata)

Previous scheme ineffectiveness = potential loss of 20-30% of ₹250 billion (Maritime Development Fund) = ₹50-75 billion at risk

आयातित घटक आपूर्ति श्रृंखला जोखिम (Aayatit Ghatak Aapurti Shrinkhla Jokhuim)

Supply chain disruptions = estimated 10-20% project timeline extension; typical impact: ₹50-150 crore delay costs per major vessel

Change Order Processing में Working Capital Cost Overruns

₹4-8 crore per ₹300 crore order (approximately 1.3-2.7% of contract value); 10-10.5% interest rate drag vs. global competitors at ~5-7%

Change Order Pricing में Manual Bottleneck और Idle Capacity Loss

₹2-4 crore per month during 2-3 month change order cycle; estimated 8-12 weeks idle capacity per order = ₹4-12 crore annual loss per shipyard

Change Order Documentation में GST और Contract Compliance Risks

₹50-100 lakh annually in GST penalties, audit rework, and ITC reconciliation labor; 20-40 hours/month manual GSTR-2B flagged invoice resolution per yard

Request Deep Analysis

🇮🇳 Be first to access this market's intelligence