Runaway detention & demurrage fees from poor coordination
Definition
Shippers regularly incur large and recurring D&D expenses when containers overstay free time at terminals or are returned late, because pickups, unloading, and returns are not tightly coordinated. With daily fees commonly $75–$300 per container day at major ports, multi‑day delays across many boxes create six‑figure annual cost overruns that provide no added value to the supply chain.[2][3][6]
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: $150,000+ per incident for large shipments, with total annual D&D costs often reaching hundreds of thousands of dollars for active importers/exporters (illustrated by demurrage examples where a single shipment incurs $150,000 in charges)[5]
- Frequency: Daily
- Root Cause: Free‑time windows are short (often 4–7 days for ocean demurrage and 3–5 days for detention) and vary by carrier and terminal, while internal warehousing, drayage, and customs processes are not synchronized to these limits.[3][4][5][6] Port congestion, documentation issues, and scheduling conflicts with dray carriers push containers past last free day; high, escalating daily charges then accumulate until the box is picked up or returned.[2][3][5][6]
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Freight and Package Transportation.
Affected Stakeholders
Import/export managers, Transportation managers, Drayage planners and dispatchers, Warehouse managers, Customs brokers, Port and terminal operations teams, CFOs and logistics finance analysts
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
$100,000-$250,000 annually from repeated owner-operator delays • $100,000-$250,000 per year from repeated container overstays across merchandise imports • $120,000-$300,000 annually from multiple containers per month in D&D charges
Current Workarounds
Distributor tracks free time via incoming port notification emails; manual follow-up texts to driver; back-charges driver if demurrage incurred • Driver calls dispatcher for quick verbal confirmation; no written record of free time; relies on carrier communication • Manual allocation to customer account based on invoice date; disputes resolved via phone with customer; some costs absorbed to maintain relationships
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Evidence Sources:
- https://www.yardview.com/post/average-detention-demurrage-fees
- https://www.hapag-lloyd.com/en/online-business/digital-insights-dock/insights/2024/06/detention-and-demurrage--what-is-the-d-d-charge-in-shipping---.html
- https://www.fourkites.com/blogs/demurrage-and-detention-charges-whats-the-difference/
Related Business Risks
Systemic under‑billing and billing‑error write‑offs on detention & demurrage
Disputed detention & demurrage charges and rework
Delayed cash collection due to contested D&D invoices
Loss of equipment and terminal capacity from prolonged container time
Regulatory exposure and penalties over non‑compliant D&D billing
Opportunistic use of D&D as de‑facto storage or leverage
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence