🇺🇸United States

Under‑reported sales and unauthorized asset use by licensees

2 verified sources

Definition

In opaque, spreadsheet-driven licensing environments, some licensees can deliberately under‑report sales, misclassify products, or continue using assets after license expiry, leading to hidden royalty losses and unapproved exploitation of brand assets.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Industry revenue‑leakage research notes that failing to bill for all services or products and unresolved billing disputes can lead to complete revenue loss on affected transactions; in licensing portfolios with significant sales, even a small percentage of under‑reported or unauthorized activity can translate into millions in lost royalties over time.
  • Frequency: Monthly
  • Root Cause: Licensors often lack integrated visibility into licensee sell‑through data and rely on self‑reported spreadsheets without automated reconciliation to contract terms, creating an environment where intentional under‑reporting or post‑expiry usage can go undetected for long periods.

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Marketing Services.

Affected Stakeholders

Brand licensing managers, Royalty audit teams, Finance and revenue assurance, Legal (enforcement and disputes), Licensee sales and finance teams

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

$1.2M+ from unresolved licensing disputes in finance • $1.2M+ scrap costs plus royalty losses from invalid materials • $1.5M+ in lost royalties from peak-season under-reporting

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Analytics Manager extracts data from retail POS system (SAP/Oracle), matches to licensing spreadsheet; identifies orphaned SKUs; escalates to Finance • Analytics Manager pulls data from multiple sources (accounting system, sales system, licensee reports); manually reconciles in Excel; creates ad-hoc pivot tables • Analytics Manager pulls Shopify revenue report, cross-references licensee's submitted Excel file, flags discrepancies via email to Account Director

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Royalty under‑collection and missed renewals in brand licensing

McKinsey cites poor contracting practices (including licensing) driving 10–20% higher total costs; industry contract‑heavy businesses report ~$200,000 per year lost from missed renewals alone, with additional millions in missed or delayed royalties across portfolios.

Excess manual administration and rework in licensing operations

McKinsey research attributes 10–20% higher total contracting costs to poor contracting practices, including manual, fragmented licensing processes; in contract-heavy environments, this translates into significant six‑ and seven‑figure annual labor and overhead overruns relative to optimized operations.

Cost of poor quality from misapplied rights and brand misuse

Industry analyses of contract and revenue leakage show that misinterpretation of pricing and terms, including rights-related clauses, drives systemic errors that affect 42% of companies; for licensors this manifests as product and campaign rework and write‑offs that can easily reach six‑figure annual totals in large portfolios.

Delayed royalty collections due to manual reporting and disputes

Research on revenue leakage in recurring and contract-based billing shows widespread billing errors and unresolved disputes that delay or forfeit revenue, with 42% of companies affected and recurring billing inaccuracies accumulating into substantial revenue and cash flow losses over time.

Lost licensing and campaign capacity from rights bottlenecks

McKinsey’s finding of 10–20% higher contracting costs from poor practices implies a material portion of staff time lost to low‑value rights clarification and document chasing; across large licensing and marketing departments this equates to hundreds of thousands in annual opportunity cost and constrained throughput.

Regulatory and contractual non‑compliance exposure in licensing

Analyses of brand licensing operations highlight non‑compliance and disputes as recurrent, expensive outcomes of fragmented rights and royalty management, with McKinsey’s 10–20% excess contracting cost band incorporating the impact of disputes, remediation, and associated advisory and legal spend.

Request Deep Analysis

🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence