Umsatzverlust durch nicht anerkannte Pflegeeinsätze
Definition
Electronic Visit Verification (EVV) or similar visit-proof systems are increasingly used to combat fraud and ensure that home care services funded by government programs were actually delivered, including time, location, and caregiver identity.[1][2][3] Where providers still rely on manual timesheets, paper signatures, or non-standardised check-ins, missed clock-ins, incorrect timestamps or incomplete records frequently cause disputes and claim rejections by payers. U.S. EVV guidance notes that every missed check‑in or incorrect timestamp can cost providers revenue because claims may be denied or delayed until corrected.[2] Australian providers working under government-funded home care packages and NDIS-equivalent support arrangements face similar proof-of-service expectations from payers and auditors, even if an explicit EVV statute like the U.S. 21st Century Cures Act does not yet apply locally.[6] If 2–5 % of billed home visits per year are challenged or disallowed for lack of robust visit evidence, a provider billing AUD 3 Mio. annually for home visits can lose AUD 60.000–150.000 of revenue each year. This is consistent with international industry statements that non-compliance or low EVV accuracy leads to claim denials and revenue leakage.[2][3] EVV-style automation with GPS, real-time timestamps and linked authorisations reduces missing data and makes it easier to defend claims in audits, turning documentation from a liability into faster reimbursements.[2][3]
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Geschätzt: 2–5 % des Jahresumsatzes mit Hausbesuchen; typischerweise AUD 60.000–150.000 p.a. Umsatzverlust je AUD 3 Mio. Visit-Umsatz durch abgelehnte/gekürzte Ansprüche wegen fehlender Besuchsnachweise
- Frequency: Laufend; bei hoher Besuchsanzahl täglich auftretend (jeder Fehler im Check‑in kann zu einer strittigen oder abgelehnten Forderung führen)
- Root Cause: Manuelle Zeiterfassung, papierbasierte Signaturen, fehlende oder inkonsistente elektronische Besuchsbestätigung; keine einheitliche EVV-Lösung über Schichten und Dienste hinweg; unklare Richtlinien für Nachdokumentation nach Schichtende.
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Home health care providers in Australia 🇦🇺 waste schätzungsweise AUD 50.000–150.000 pro Jahr je 100 Klienten durch abgelehnte oder gekürzte Leistungsnachweise wegen unvollständiger Besuchsdokumentation. Automation of visit capture and EVV-style verification eliminates this revenue loss.
Affected Stakeholders
Geschäftsführung von Home-Care-Organisationen, Finanzleitung / CFO, Leitung Abrechnung & Revenue Cycle, Einsatzplanung / Scheduling, IT- und Digitalisierungsverantwortliche
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Verzögerter Zahlungseingang durch manuelle Besuchsverifizierung
Betrugs- und Missbrauchsrisiko bei Hausbesuchen ohne EVV
Sanktions- und Rückforderungsrisiko wegen Nichteinhaltung von Besuchsnachweispflichten
WHS Risk from Inadequate Aide Competency
Provider Supervision Non-Compliance Fines
Supervision Time Overruns
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence