Nicht fakturierbare Lehrleistungen wegen verzögerter Kurs‑Akkreditierung

Definition

ASQA accredits courses to meet skills and knowledge gaps that are not covered by training packages, and providers must apply with detailed documentation, including learning outcomes, assessment strategies, and evidence of industry need.[5] Similarly, providers delivering to overseas students must have their institutions and courses registered on CRICOS before enrolling students in them.[6] Where language schools rely on accredited ELICOS, VET‑English, or pathway programs, delays in course accreditation or renewal—caused by incomplete documentation or misaligned outcome reporting—prevent them from marketing and enrolling students at premium accredited prices. This creates revenue leakage in two ways: (1) empty or under‑utilised capacity while waiting for approvals; and (2) delivery of non‑accredited short courses at lower price points instead of fully accredited offerings that attract higher fees and visa‑linked demand. LOGIC: If a school planned to run a new accredited English course with 40 students at AUD 400 pro Woche für 10 Wochen (AUD 16.000 pro Kurs), a six‑monatige Verzögerung der Akkreditierung kann realistisch 1–2 Kursdurchläufe kosten, also AUD 16.000–32.000 entgangenen Umsatz pro Kurs/Standort. Über mehrere Kurse und Standorte summiert sich dies leicht auf 5–15 % des Jahresumsatzes.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Private Sprachschulen in Australien 🇦🇺 verlieren 5–15 % potenziellen Jahresumsatz, weil neue Kurse aufgrund schleppender Akkreditierung und unvollständiger Outcome‑Nachweise verspätet starten. Automation of course approval workflows, document templates, and aligned outcome reporting brings courses to market earlier and at full accredited pricing.

Affected Stakeholders

CEO/Owner privater Sprachschulen, Akademische Leitung/Director of Studies, Compliance Manager/CRICOS & ASQA Liaison, Sales- und Marketingteams für internationale Studenten

Related Business Risks